Top 10 Employment Law Decisions in 2024
-
Speaker : SUSAN FAHEY DESMOND
-
When : Thursday, December 12, 2024
-
Time : 01 : 00 PM EST
-
Add To Calendar
Refer a Friend
Susan Fahey Desmond is a partner with McGlinchey Stafford PLLC with
offices across the country. A noted author and speaker, Susan has been
representing management in all areas of labor and employment law for
over 35 years. She has been named in Best Lawyers in America and as one
of America’s Leading Business Lawyers for labor and employment law. She
has also been named as one of the top 25 female lawyers in Louisiana.
Susan is licensed to practice in Colorado, Louisiana, and Mississippi.
This
webinar has been approved for 1.00 HR (General) recertification
credit hours toward aPHR™, aPHRi™, PHR®, PHRca®, SPHR®, GPHR®, PHRi™,
and SPHRi™ recertification through HR Certification Institute® (HRCI®).
Please make note of the activity ID number on your recertification
application form. For more information about certification or
recertification, please visit the HR Certification Institute website at
www.hrci.org
For any further assistance please contact us at support@grceducators.com
Federal agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Labor, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and others have often guided employers of what their obligations are. For the past 40 years, courts were required to give “deference” to these agencies’ interpretation of the law. Some believed that this deference gave a sense of continuity across the country. Some believed that agencies were frequently overstepping their bounds in passing some controversial regulations. The required deference often left courts to “disagree” with a regulation but feeling bound by it. Now that this deference has been taken away, what can we expect in the future? What other important cases have we seen?
Areas Covered
- Pre-Chevron deference – the age of the Skidmore deference
- How did we get to the Chevron deference doctrine
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo – the end of Chevron
- What can we expect post-Loper?
- The Supreme Court’s easing the burden of establishing a discrimination case in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis
- Court decisions challenging agency actions such as the DOL’s wage and hour regulations, the FTC’s noncompete rule, and others
Who Should Attend
In-house counsel, human resource managers
Why Should You Attend
What a year it has been! Some Supreme Court decisions may have not been so surprising but nonetheless very important. Other Supreme Court decisions that are definitely going to change the landscape of employment law. How have the lower courts already reacted to these decisions? What can we expect from courts (and federal agencies) in the future?
Topic Background
When we talk about the “top” employment law decisions in any given year, it is often a matter of opinion. This year, however, saw some cases that are undeniably some of the most important decisions guiding courts and human resource professionals alike.
-
$160.00
-
